"In the beginnings of language, being able to name things, to possess them through the voice for the man must have had a wonderful charm and somewhat hidden. The world began to be dominated by virtue of the word. It is telling that in the old stories there magic words that open doors, destroying obstacles, yields will and whose secret is not ever explained. The prestige revive ancient word to the strange voices, as if the sound has opened closed doors in the soul. "CIRO ALEGRIA
are many questions about the origin of language and explanations about the way he came. The language already existed in prehistory. Questions to generate concern and fascination, questions that have led to experiments and considerable controversy. During the nineteenth century, the controversies over the origin of language came to the point that in 1866 the Linguistic Society of Paris was forced to stop any debate on this issue. The truth is that we have no direct knowledge about the origins and early development of language. There is currently a hypothesis that can be considered a definitive explanation of the origin of human language.
is indisputable that language is a means renderer. But the kind of representation that involves and how it is organized have gone through all the arguments about its configuration. Is a level of self-representation on the conceptualization and perception. It is a tool to represent the concepts and operate with them, so that we can represent all that is possible to represent in the world, even allows the representation of ourselves, representation that we call consciousness.
In the West, traditionally it was based on the biblical basis that all came from the Hebrew language. This bias for a long time hindered progress in this field until the appearance of comparative linguistics in the late eighteenth century. From the study of Sanskrit (a dead language of India) and comparison with European languages \u200b\u200bcame to the conclusion that most of the languages \u200b\u200bspoken in Europe belong to the same family as most languages India and Persia, and they all should come from a common language disappeared in what was called Indo-European. Other studies led to establish the existence of other families such as Semitic (which belong to the Arabic and Hebrew) and many others, with the thesis of Hebrew as a mother tongue of all other definitely disappeared. It proper respect the emergence of language have developed several theories, none of which can be tested scientifically and, therefore, are nothing more than mere hypotheses .
is indisputable that language is a means renderer. But the kind of representation that involves and how it is organized have gone through all the arguments about its configuration. Is a level of self-representation on the conceptualization and perception. It is a tool to represent the concepts and operate with them, so that we can represent all that is possible to represent in the world, even allows the representation of ourselves, representation that we call consciousness.
In the West, traditionally it was based on the biblical basis that all came from the Hebrew language. This bias for a long time hindered progress in this field until the appearance of comparative linguistics in the late eighteenth century. From the study of Sanskrit (a dead language of India) and comparison with European languages \u200b\u200bcame to the conclusion that most of the languages \u200b\u200bspoken in Europe belong to the same family as most languages India and Persia, and they all should come from a common language disappeared in what was called Indo-European. Other studies led to establish the existence of other families such as Semitic (which belong to the Arabic and Hebrew) and many others, with the thesis of Hebrew as a mother tongue of all other definitely disappeared. It proper respect the emergence of language have developed several theories, none of which can be tested scientifically and, therefore, are nothing more than mere hypotheses .
0 comments:
Post a Comment